Salary for Accountants
Accounting Salaries
An accountant salary can be incredibly lucrative, with fairly consistent salaries and well-established patterns of career growth all across the accounting profession.
Most accountant salaries remain in the same range, even across the various careers; experience, level of education, location and size of the company or accounting firm are generally the differentiating factors.
Although major accounting firms and private corporations pay more than smaller employers, almost all entry-level accounting jobs pay their employees between $30,000 and $50,000. After this point, obtaining the high-end salaries that exist in the accounting world is a matter of determination and excellence.
Management accountants, for example, who work their way up to the position of CFO or even CEO, or public accountants who become partners or senior partners of their firms, can make upwards of $300,000. Even if you decide to stick to more basic accounting job responsibilities, employees who have successfully worked as accountants for over 10 years will easily make an $80,000+ salary.
Accountant Salary Comparison Chart
| Entry Level | Mid Level | Senior Level | |
| Public Accountants | $31,750 $51,250 | $41,000 $93,750 | $70,000 $300,000+ |
| Management Accountants | $31,500 $52,500 | $43,250 $67,250 | $62,000 $358,750 |
| Forensic Accountants | $30,000 $60,000 | $65,000 $80,000 | $80,000 $125,000 |
| Tax Accountants | $40,627 $51,640 | $51,433 $80,821 | $61,324 $102,089 |
source: allbusinessschools
click here for more salary information
In: Careers · Tagged with: Accountant Salary, Accountants Salaries, Accounting Firm, Accounting Firms, Accounting Profession, Accounting Salaries, Basic Accounting, Career Growth, Education Location, Entry Level Accounting Jobs, Forensic Accountants, Management Accountants, Mid Level, Private Corporations, Public Accountants, Salary Comparison, Salary For Accountants, Salary Information, Senior Partners, Tax Accountants
U.S. Set To Make $8 Billion From Bailing Out Citi by David Cho Washington Post Staff Writer
Among the banks that rule Wall Street, Citigroup got a bailout that was bigger than the rest. Now the company is about to pay a king’s ransom for its federal rescue.
The Obama administration is making final preparations to sell its stake in the New York bank, according to industry and federal sources.
At today’s prices, the sale would net more than $8 billion, by far the largest profit returned from any firm that accepted bailout funds and the transaction would be the second-largest stock sale in history.
On paper, the government’s 27 percent stake has grown in value to $33 billion. The size of the deal in the works has Wall Street buzzing. Only the stock offering by Japan’s Nippon Telegraph and Telephone, which raised $36.8 billion in 1987, was larger, according to Thomson Reuters.
Leading financial firms, including J.P. Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, are vying to be chosen as the deal’s underwriters to gain the prestige of managing a historic stock sale as well as the fees from investors who buy the shares.
To improve their chances, some banks, such as Goldman Sachs, are offering their services to the Treasury Department at almost no cost, industry officials familiar with the matter said.
Sign of bailout’s success
The windfall expected from the stock sale would amount to a validation of the rescue plan adopted by government officials during the height of the financial panic, when the banking system neared the brink of collapse.
A year ago, Citigroup’s stock hovered around a dollar a share, and the bank’s future seemed in doubt. On Friday, the stock closed at $4.31.
If the sale proceeds as planned, Citigroup would be able to cut nearly all of its ties to the $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program. Meanwhile, the administration could highlight the profit generated from the rescue of big banks.
“It’s unprecedented to do [a stock sale] of this size right after the financial industry has been so battered,” said an industry official who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to comment publicly. “It’s just a very bullish sign.”
The Treasury, as well as the Wall Street firms, declined to comment on the stock sale.
Citigroup’s performance has lagged behind its rivals in Lower Manhattan. In January, the company announced a $1.6 billion loss for 2009. By comparison, J.P. Morgan Chase earned $11.7 billion. But Citigroup’s executives said at the time that they saw its business stabilizing, allowing the company to set aside less money in the last three months of 2009 to cover losses than it did for the same period of 2008.
Citigroup was among nine major banks that were the first to take bailout funds in October 2008, and all have returned their federal loans. In addition to these repayments, the Treasury has received interest, dividends and about $3.5 billion from the sale of warrants, which are contracts allowing a holder to buy a company’s stock in the future.
Lower than expected costs
The true cost of rescuing the financial system, however, is not yet known. Senior Treasury officials have said that they expect the ultimate cost of TARP to be less than $100 billion. Besides TARP programs, mortgage financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have received more than $125 billion in federal aid. There is no indication that either firm will be able to repay the government anytime soon.
Yet many economists say that rescuing large Wall Street firms has come at a much lower cost than expected.
During the height of the financial crisis in October and November of 2008, Citigroup got more than $45 billion in federal aid in exchange for preferred shares. The government later restructured that package. Officials converted $20 billion into a loan, and the remaining $25 billion was converted in September into common stock at the price of $3.25 a share.
Citigroup was the only bank that gave common shares to the government, because the firm was in worse shape than its rivals and couldn’t promise to repay its aid entirely in cash.
In December, the bank announced it would raise money from investors to repay the $20 billion loan. The Treasury said at that time that it would sell its Citigroup shares in phases this year, beginning with a $5 billion deal.
The value of the government’s stake had grown to $33.1 billion at the end of regular trading Friday.
By issuing stock and giving it to the government last year, Citigroup had diluted the value of stock held by existing shareholders. The company could ratify a reverse stock split to enhance the value of shares.
Last fall, the bank’s shareholders approved a proposal by the company’s board of directors to speed a reverse stock split before June 30.
source: msnbc
click here for more salary information
In: Business Stories · Tagged with: Bailout, Banking System, Brink Of Collapse, Citigroup, David Cho, Federal Sources, Final Preparations, Financial Indust, Financial Panic, Goldman Sachs, Industry Officials, J P Morgan, J P Morgan Chase, Morgan Stanley, Nippon Telegraph And Telephone, Reuters, Treasury Department, Troubled Assets, Washington Post, Windfall
Ford’s Alan Mulally receives million dollar raise for 2009 by MARK KLEIS
Ford’s CEO, Alan Mulally, who is often credited for the automaker’s recent turnaround, received a raise of nearly six percent to a total compensation package of $17.9 million for his effort in 2009. Ford posted a $2.7 billion profit for 2009 – the first annual profit in four years.
In 2009 Alan Mulally earned just $1.4 million in salary – a 30 percent cut in salary from the year before in exchange for concessions from labor unions. Mulally also forwent a cash bonus for the second year.
Mulally’s total compensation of nearly $18 million instead came largely from stock and option awards which totaled $16.5 million, which increased his total compensation due to the stock’s strong performance. Stock was trading at $13.99 on Monday by close, compared to $2.11 just last March.
Reuters points out that Ford stock massively outperformed the rest of the automotive sector for 2009 – increasing by over 700 percent compared to the S&P which rose just 23 percent. Ford originally anticipated a return to profitability in 2010, but due to strong product performance, largely positive media coverage and struggling rivals, the automaker was able to turn a profit ahead of schedule. The automaker is still projecting a full return to profitability for 2010.
Ford Motor Company’s previous CEO, William Clay Ford Jr., stepped down by his own accord in 2006 when he found and hired Alan Mulally to continue what he believed he could not achieve himself. Ford has not received any form of compensation since 2005, and vowed not to receive compensation until the automaker which bears his name returned to profitability for a full year.
Ford Motor Company plans to compensate William Clay Ford Jr. $16.8 million for his work as chairman once the board determines that the automaker achieved profitability on a global basis for its operations in 2009.
Ford Motor Company recorded a profit and obtained market share increases in both the U.S. and European markets for 2009.
source: LEFTLANE
click here for more salary information
In: Business Stories · Tagged with: Alan Mulally, Automaker, Board Determines That, Cash Bonus, Compensation Package, Concessions, Ford Motor, Ford Motor Company, Global Basis, Kleis, Labor Unions, Media Coverage, Own Accord, Performance Stock, Product Performance, Profitability, Reuters, Share Increases, William Clay Ford, William Clay Ford Jr